<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Biology of Sex Differences - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Biology of Sex Differences</description>
        <dc:date>2012-04-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/1/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/1/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/1/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/2" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/8">
        <title>Sex differences in behavioral decision-making and the modulation of shared neural circuits</title>
        <description>Animals prioritize behaviors according to their physiological needs and reproductive goals, selecting a single behavioral strategy from a repertoire of possible responses to any given stimulus. Biological sex influences this decision-making process in significant ways, differentiating the responses animals choose when faced with stimuli ranging from food to conspecifics. We review here recent work in invertebrate models, including C. elegans, Drosophila, and a variety of insects, mollusks and crustaceans, that has begun to offer intriguing insights into the neural mechanisms underlying the sexual modulation of behavioral decision-making. These findings show that an animal&apos;s sex can modulate neural function in surprisingly diverse ways, much like internal physiological variables such as hunger or thirst. In the context of homeostatic behaviors such as feeding, an animal&apos;s sex and nutritional status may converge on a common physiological mechanism, the functional modulation of shared sensory circuitry, to influence decision-making. Similarly, considerable evidence suggests that decisions on whether to mate or fight with conspecifics are also mediated through sex-specific neuromodulatory control of nominally shared neural circuits. This work offers a new perspective on how sex differences in behavior emerge, in which the regulated function of shared neural circuitry plays a crucial role. Emerging evidence from vertebrates indicates that this paradigm is likely to extend to more complex nervous systems as well. As men and women differ in their susceptibility to a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders affecting shared behaviors, these findings may ultimately have important implications for human health.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>William Mowrey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Douglas Portman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2012, null:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-3-8</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-3-8-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/1">
        <title>Sex differences in autoimmune disease</title>
        <description>Women are more susceptible to a variety of autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), multiple sclerosis (MS), primary biliary cirrhosis, rheumatoid arthritis and Hashimoto&apos;s thyroiditis. This increased susceptibility in females compared to males is also present in animal models of autoimmune diseases such as spontaneous SLE in (NZBxNZW)F1 and NZM.2328 mice, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in SJL mice, thyroiditis, Sjogren&apos;s syndrome in MRL/Mp-lpr/lpr mice and diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice. Indeed, being female confers a greater risk of developing these diseases than any single genetic or environmental risk factor discovered to date. Understanding how the state of being female so profoundly affects autoimmune disease susceptibility would accomplish two major goals. First, it would lead to an insight into the major pathways of disease pathogenesis and, secondly, it would likely lead to novel treatments which would disrupt such pathways.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Rhonda Voskuhl</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2011, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-01-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-2-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-2-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-01-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/14">
        <title>Strategies and Methods to Study Sex Differences in Cardiovascular  Structure and Function: A Guide for Basic Scientists
</title>
        <description>Background:
Cardiovascular disease remains the primary cause of death worldwide. In the US, deaths due to cardiovascular disease for women exceed those of men. While cultural and psychosocial factors such as education, economic status, marital status and access to healthcare contribute to sex differences in adverse outcomes, physiological and molecular bases of differences between women and men that contribute to development of cardiovascular disease and response to therapy remain underexplored.
Methods:
This article describes concepts, methods and procedures to assist in the design of animal and tissue/cell based studies of sex differences in cardiovascular structure, function and models of disease.
Results:
To address knowledge gaps, study designs must incorporate appropriate experimental material including species/strain characteristics, sex and hormonal status. Determining whether a sex difference exists in a trait must take into account the reproductive status and history of the animal including those used for tissue (cell) harvest, such as the presence of gonadal steroids at the time of testing, during development or number of pregnancies. When selecting the type of experimental animal, additional consideration should be given to diet requirements (soy or plant based influencing consumption of phytoestrogen), lifespan, frequency of estrous cycle in females, and ability to investigate developmental or environmental components of disease modulation. Stress imposed by disruption of sleep/wake cycles, patterns of social interaction (or degree of social isolation), or handling may influence adrenal hormones that interact with pathways activated by the sex steroid hormones. Care must be given to selection of hormonal treatment and route of administration.
Conclusions:
Accounting for sex in the design and interpretation of studies including pharmacological effects of drugs is essential to increase the foundation of basic knowledge upon which to build translational approaches to prevent, diagnose and treat cardiovascular diseases in humans.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Virginia Miller</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jay Kaplan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nicholas Schork</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pamela Ouyang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sarah Berga</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nanette Wenger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leslee Shaw</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>R Clinton Webb</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Monica Mallampalli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Meir Steiner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Doris Taylor</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>C Noel Bairey Merz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jane Reckelhoff</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2011, null:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-12-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-2-14</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-2-14-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/9">
        <title>Sex-specific mouse liver gene expression: genome-wide analysis of developmental changes from pre-pubertal period to young adulthood</title>
        <description>Background:
Early liver development and the transcriptional transitions during hepatogenesis are well characterized. However, gene expression changes during the late postnatal/pre-pubertal to young adulthood period are less well understood, especially with regards to sex-specific gene expression.
Methods:
Microarray analysis of male and female mouse liver was carried out at 3, 4, and 8 wk of age to elucidate developmental changes in gene expression from the late postnatal/pre-pubertal period to young adulthood.
Results:
A large number of sex-biased and sex-independent genes showed significant changes during this developmental period. Notably, sex-independent genes involved in cell cycle, chromosome condensation, and DNA replication were down regulated from 3 wk to 8 wk, while genes associated with metal ion binding, ion transport and kinase activity were up regulated. A majority of genes showing sex differential expression in adult liver did not display sex differences prior to puberty, at which time extensive changes in sex-specific gene expression were seen, primarily in males. Thus, in male liver, 76% of male-specific genes were up regulated and 47% of female-specific genes were down regulated from 3 to 8 wk of age, whereas in female liver 67% of sex-specific genes showed no significant change in expression. In both sexes, genes up regulated from 3 to 8 wk were significantly enriched (p &lt; E-76) in the set of genes positively regulated by the liver transcription factor HNF4&#945;, as determined in a liver-specific HNF4&#945; knockout mouse model, while genes down regulated during this developmental period showed significant enrichment (p &lt; E-65) for negative regulation by HNF4&#945;. Significant enrichment of the developmentally regulated genes in the set of genes subject to positive and negative regulation by pituitary hormone was also observed. Five sex-specific transcriptional regulators showed sex-specific expression at 4 wk (male-specific Ihh; female-specific Cdx4, Cux2, Tox, and Trim24) and may contribute to the developmental changes that lead to global acquisition of liver sex-specificity by 8 wk of age.
Conclusions:
Overall, the observed changes in gene expression during postnatal liver development reflect the deceleration of liver growth and the induction of specialized liver functions, with widespread changes in sex-specific gene expression primarily occurring in male liver.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Tara Conforto</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Waxman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2012, null:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-3-9</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-3-9-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/7">
        <title>Sex differences in primary hypertension</title>
        <description>Men have higher blood pressure than women through much of life regardless of race and ethnicity. This is a robust and highly conserved sex difference that it is also observed across species including dogs, rats, mice and chickens and it is found in induced, genetic and transgenic animal models of hypertension. Not only do the differences between the ovarian and testicular hormonal milieu contribute to this sexual dimorphism in blood pressure, the sex chromosomes also play a role in and of themselves. This review primarily focuses on epidemiological studies of blood pressure in men and women and experimental models of hypertension in both sexes. Gaps in current knowledge regarding what underlie male-female differences in blood pressure control are discussed. Elucidating the mechanisms underlying sex differences in hypertension may lead to the development of anti-hypertensives tailored to one&apos;s sex and ultimately to improved therapeutic strategies for treating this disease and preventing its devastating consequences.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Kathryn Sandberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hong Ji</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2012, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-3-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-3-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/4">
        <title>Tempests and Tales: Challenges to the Study of Sex Differences in the Brain.</title>
        <description>We here review two recent popular press books which challenge the notion that there are biological sex differences in the brain, Rebecca J. Jordan-Young&apos;s   &quot;Brainstorm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences&quot; (2010 Harvard University Press) and Cordelia Fine&apos;s &quot;Delusions of Gender: How our Minds, Society and Neurosexism Create a Difference&quot; (2010 W.W. Norton Company, New York).  While there is much of merit in each, both resort to hyperbole and superficiality, with numerous inaccurate representations of the current state of the art.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Margaret McCarthy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gregory Ball</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2011, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-04-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-2-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-2-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-04-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/1/1/5">
        <title>The impact of sex, gender and pregnancy on 2009 H1N1 disease</title>
        <description>Children and young adults of reproductive age have emerged as groups that are highly vulnerable to the current 2009 H1N1 pandemic. The sex of an individual is a fundamental factor that can influence exposure, susceptibility and immune responses to influenza. Worldwide, the incidence, disease burden, morbidity and mortality rates following exposure to the 2009 H1N1 influenza virus differ between males and females and are often age-dependent. Pregnancy and differences in the presentation of various risk factors contribute to the worse outcome of infection in women. Vaccination and antiviral treatment efficacy also vary in a sex-dependent manner. Finally, sex-specific genetic and hormonal differences may contribute to the severity of influenza and the clearance of viral infection. The contribution of sex and gender to influenza can only be determined by a greater consideration of these factors in clinical and epidemiological studies and increased research into the biological basis underlying these differences.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/1/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Sabra Klein</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Catherine Passaretti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martha Anker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>'Peju Olukoya</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Pekosz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2010, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-11-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-1-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-1-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-11-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/1/1/3">
        <title>Expression and localization of forkhead transcriptional factor 2 (Foxl2) in the gonads of protogynous wrasse, Halichoeres trimaculatus</title>
        <description>Background:
Three-spot wrasse, Halichoeres trimaculatus, is a marine protogynous hermaphrodite fish. Individuals mature either as initial phase (IP) males or females. Appropriate social cues induce the sex change from IP female to terminal phase (TP) male. However, the molecular mechanisms behind such a sex change remain largely unknown. Recently, the forkhead transcription factor 2 (Foxl2) was identified as an essential regulator of vertebrate ovarian development/function/phenotype. Inspired by this information, we characterized the expression patterns of Foxl2 in the protogynous wrasse assuming Foxl2 as the female-specific marker in this species.
Methods:
First, we clonedFoxl2 cDNA from ovary by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) followed by rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). Next, we analysed expression pattern of Foxl2 messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein in gonads of different sexual phases by real time quantitative PCR assay and flour fluorescence immunohistochemical method, respectively. Additionally, we studied the changes in Foxl2 expression pattern during aromatase inhibitor (AI)-induced sex change.
Results:
The amino acid sequence (306 AA) of wrasse Foxl2, especially the forkhead domain, shows high identity with that of other reported teleost Foxl2s. Quite unexpectedly, no sexual dimorphism was observable between the testes and ovary in the expression pattern of Foxl2. In female phase fish, signals for Foxl2 protein were detectable in the granulosa cells, but not the theca cells. Transcript levels of Foxl2 in the testes of IP and TP males were identical to that in the ovaries of females and, further, Foxl2 protein was found to be localized in the interstitial cells including tubules and Leydig cells. Treatment with AI induced sex change in male gonads and an up-regulation was seen in the expression of Foxl2 in these gonads.
Conclusions:
Unlike in other vertebrates, including teleosts, Foxl2 may have a different role in the naturally sex changing fishes.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/1/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Yasuhisa Kobayashi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ryo Horiguchi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ryo Nozu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Masaru Nakamura</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2010, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-11-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-1-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-1-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-11-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/1/1/8">
        <title>A developmental sex difference in hippocampal neurogenesis is mediated by endogenous estradiol.</title>
        <description>Background:
Oestradiol is a steroid hormone that exerts extensive influence on brain development and is a powerful modulator of hippocampal structure and function. The hippocampus is a critical brain region regulating complex cognitive and emotional responses and is implicated in the aetiology of several mental health disorders, many of which exhibit some degree of sex difference. Many sex differences in the adult rat brain are determined by oestradiol action during a sensitive period of development. We had previously reported a sex difference in rates of cell genesis in the developing hippocampus of the laboratory rat. Males generate more new cells on average than females. The current study explored the effects of both exogenous and endogenous oestradiol on this sex difference.
Methods:
New born male and female rat pups were injected with the mitotic marker 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) and oestradiol or agents that antagonize oestradiol action. The effects on cell number, proliferation, differentiation and survival were assessed at several time points. Significant differences between groups were determined by two- or thee-Way ANOVA.
Results:
Newborn males had higher rates of cell proliferation than females. Oestradiol treatment increased cell proliferation in neonatal females, but not males, and in the CA1 region many of these cells differentiated into neurons. The increased rate of proliferation induced by neonatal oestradiol persisted until at least 3 weeks of age, suggesting an organizational effect. Administering the aromatase inhibitor, formestane, or the oestrogen receptor antagonist, tamoxifen, significantly decreased the number of new cells in males but not females.
Conclusion:
Endogenous oestradiol increased the rate of cell proliferation observed in newborn males compared to females. This sex difference in neonatal neurogenesis may have implications for adult differences in learning strategy, stress responsivity or vulnerability to damage or disease.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/1/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>J Michael Bowers</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jaylyn Waddell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Margaret McCarthy</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2010, null:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-11-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-1-8</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-1-8-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-11-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/2">
        <title>Influence of ERbeta selective agonism during the neonatal period on the sexual differentiation of the rat hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis</title>
        <description>Background:
It is well established that sexual differentiation of the rodent hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis is principally orchestrated by estrogen during the perinatal period. Here we sought to better characterize the mechanistic role the beta form of the estrogen receptor (ER&#946;) plays in this process.
Methods:
To achieve this, we exposed neonatal female rats to three doses (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg) of the ER&#946; selective agonist diarylpropionitrile (DPN) using estradiol benzoate (EB) as a positive control. Measures included day of vaginal opening, estrous cycle quality, GnRH and Fos co-localization following ovariectomy and hormone priming, circulating luteinizing hormone (LH) levels and quantification of hypothalamic kisspeptin immunoreactivity. A second set of females was then neonatally exposed to DPN, the ER&#945; agonist propyl-pyrazole-triol (PPT), DPN+PPT, or EB to compare the impact of ER&#945; and ER&#946; selective agonism on kisspeptin gene expression in pre- and post-pubescent females.
Results:
All three DPN doses significantly advanced the day of vaginal opening and induced premature anestrus. GnRH and Fos co-labeling, a marker of GnRH activation, following ovariectomy and hormone priming was reduced by approximately half at all doses; the magnitude of which was not as large as with EB or what we have previously observed with the ER&#945; agonist PPT. LH levels were also correspondingly lower, compared to control females. No impact of DPN was observed on the density of kisspeptin immunoreactive (-ir) fibers or cell bodies in the arcuate (ARC) nucleus, and kisspeptin-ir was only significantly reduced by the middle (1 mg/kg) DPN dose in the preoptic region. The second experiment revealed that EB, PPT and the combination of DPN+PPT significantly abrogated preoptic Kiss1 expression at both ages but ARC expression was only reduced by EB.
Conclusion:
Our results indicate that selective agonism of ER&#946; is not sufficient to completely achieve male-typical HPG organization observed with EB or an ER&#945; agonist.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Heather Patisaul</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sandra Losa-Ward</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karina Todd</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katherine McCaffrey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jillian Mickens</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2012, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-3-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-3-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

