<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Biology of Sex Differences - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Biology of Sex Differences</description>
        <dc:date>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/9" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/4">
        <title>Oral contraceptives modify DNA methylation and monocyte-derived macrophage function</title>
        <description>Background:
Fertile women may be encouraged to use contraception during clinical trial to avoid drug effects on foetuses. However, hormonal contraception interferes with pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and modifies internal milieus. Macrophages depend on the milieu to which they are exposed. Therefore, we assessed whether macrophage function would be affected by the use of combined oral contraceptives (OCs) and if this influence depended on the androgenic or non-androgenic properties of progestin.
Methods:
Healthy adult women were enrolled and stratified into two groups: women who did not use OCs (Fs) and women treated with OCs (FOCs). FOCs were further stratified as a function of androgenic (FOCA+) and non-androgenic (FOCA-) properties of progestins. Routine haematological, biochemical, inflammatory and endothelial dysfunction parameters were measured. Monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) were evaluated for the expression and activity of oestrogen receptors and androgen receptors, and release of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)  was measured from unstimulated and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated cells.
Results:
As known, the use of OCs changed numerous parameters: the number of lymphocytes, iron levels, total iron-binding capacity of transferrin, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, and C-reactive protein increased, while prothrombin time and alkaline phosphatase decreased. Hormonal asset also varied: cortisol was higher in FOCs, while luteinising hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and testosterone were lower in FOCs. Asymmetric dimethylarginine, an index of endothelial function, was lower in FOC than in Fs, as were cysteine and bilirubin. The androgenic properties of progestins affected the activity of OCs: in particular, white blood cell count, haemoglobin, high-density lipoprotein and calcium were higher in FOCA- than in FOCA+, whereas % oxygen saturation and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase were lower in FOCA- than in FOCA+. Importantly, FOCs had a lower global DNA methylation, indicating that OC may have epigenetic effects on gene expression. OC did not modify the expression of androgen receptor but increased oestrogen receptor-alpha expression, more considerably in FOCA+, and decreased oestrogen receptor-beta, more considerably in FOCA-. Importantly, the activation state of oestrogen receptor-beta in FOCs was decreased, while oestrogen receptor-alpha was not active in either Fs or FOCs. Unstimulated MDMs obtained from FOCs showed higher release of  TNF-alpha  in comparison with Fs. After lipopolysaccharide stimulation, the release of TNF-alpha  was significantly higher in Fs than in FOCs.
Conclusions:
OC use induced many changes in haematological and plasmatic markers, modifying hormonal asset, endothelial function, inflammation index and some parameters of redox state, producing a perturbation of the internal milieu that impacted macrophagic function. In fact, different levels of oestrogen receptor expression and release of TNF-alpha were observed in macrophages derived from OC users. Some of the above activities were linked to the androgenic properties of progestin. Even though it is not known whether these effects are reversible the results indicate that a single type of OC should be used during a single clinical trial.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Ilaria Campesi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manuela Sanna</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Angelo Zinellu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ciriaco Carru</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laura Rubattu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pamela Bulzomi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giuseppe Seghieri</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giancarlo Tonolo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mario Palermo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giuseppe Rosano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Marino</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Flavia Franconi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2012, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-3-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-3-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/3">
        <title>Why Does Jack and not Jill Break His Crown: Sex Disparity in Brain Tumors</title>
        <description>It is often reported that brain tumors occur more frequently in males, and that males suffer a worse outcome from brain tumors than females. If correct, these observations suggest that sex plays a fundamental role in brain tumor biology. The following review of the literature regarding primary and metastatic brain tumors, reveals that brain tumors do occur more frequently in males compared to females regardless of age, tumor histology or region of the world. Sexually dimorphic mechanisms that might control tumor cell biology, as well as immune and brain microenvironmental responses to cancer, are explored as the basis for this sex disparity. Elucidating the mechanisms by which sex chromosomes and sex hormones impact on brain tumorigenesis and progression will advance our understanding of basic cancer biology and is likely to be essential for optimizing the care of brain tumor patients.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Tao Sun</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nicole Warrington</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joshua Rubin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2012, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-3-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-3-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/2">
        <title>Influence of ERbeta selective agonism during the neonatal period on the sexual differentiation of the rat hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis</title>
        <description>Background:
It is well established that sexual differentiation of the rodent hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis is principally orchestrated by estrogen during the perinatal period. Here we sought to better characterize the mechanistic role the beta form of the estrogen receptor (ERbeta) plays in this process.
Methods:
To achieve this, we exposed neonatal female rats to three doses (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg) of the ERbeta selective agonist diarylpropionitrile (DPN) using estradiol benzoate (EB) as a positive control.  Measures included day of vaginal opening, estrous cycle quality, GnRH and Fos co-localization following ovariectomy and hormone priming, circulating luteinizing hormone (LH) levels and quantification of hypothalamic kisspeptin immunoreactivity.  A second set of females was then neonatally exposed to DPN, the ERalpha agonist propyl-pyrazole-triol(PPT), DPN+PPT, or EB to compare the impact of ERalpha and ERbeta selective agonism on kisspeptin gene expression in pre- and post-pubescent females.
Results:
All three DPN doses significantly advanced day of vaginal opening and induced premature anestrus.  GnRH and Fos co-labeling, a marker of GnRH activation, following ovariectomy and hormone priming was reduced by approximately half at all doses, the magnitude of which was not as large as with EB or what we have previously observed with the ERalpha agonist PPT.  LH levels were also correspondingly lower, compared to control females.  No impact of DPN was observed on the density of kisspeptin immunoreactive (-ir) fibers or cell bodies in the arcuate (ARC) nucleus, and kisspeptin-ir was only significantly reduced by the middle (1 mg/kg) DPN dose in the preoptic region.  The second experiment revealed that EB, PPT and the combination of DPN+PPT significantly abrogated preoptic Kiss1 expression at both ages but ARC expression was only reduced by EB.
Conclusion:
Our results indicate that selective agonism of ERbeta is not sufficient to completely achieve male-typical HPG organization observed with EB or an ERalpha agonist.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Heather Patisaul</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sandra Losa-Ward</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karina Todd</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katherine McCaffrey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jillian Mickens</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2012, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-3-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-3-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/1">
        <title>
Alterations in vasomotor systems and mechanics of resistance-sized mesenteric arteries from SHR and WKY male rats following in vivo Testosterone manipulation
</title>
        <description>Background:
Testosterone (T) and the sympathetic nervous system each contribute to the pathology of hypertension. Altered blood vessel reactivity is also associated with the pathology of high blood pressure. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of T manipulation in the regulation of resistance-sized blood vessel reactivity.
Methods:
Adult spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) and Wistar Kyoto (WKY) male rats at 8 weeks of age were used. The rats were divided into groups consisting of gonadally intact controls (CONT), castrate with sham implant (CAST) and castrate with T implant (CAST + T) (n = 6 to 12 per group). Following a short-term period of T treatment (approximately 4 weeks), plasma norepinephrine (NE) and plasma T were assessed by performing high-performance liquid chromatography and RIA, respectively. Resistance-sized mesenteric artery reactivity was assessed on a pressurized arteriograph for myogenic reactivity (MYO), phenylephrine (PE) responsiveness and passive structural mechanics.
Results:
SHR and WKY males exhibited similar physiological trends in T manipulation, with castration significantly lowering plasma T and NE and T replacement significantly increasing plasma T and NE. T manipulation in general resulted in significant alterations in MYO of second-order mesenteric arteries, with T replacement decreasing MYO in SHR (P &lt; 0.05) compared to CONT, T replacement increasing MYO, and CAST decreasing MYO in WKY rats (P &lt; 0.001) compared to CONT rats. Additionally, PE-induced constriction was significantly altered in both strains following T treatment, with the effective concentration of PE to constrict the vessel to 50% of the total diameter significantly increased in the CAST + T SHR compared to CONT (P &lt; 0.05). Comparisons of passive structural mechanics between SHR and WKY treatment groups indicated in SHR a significantly increased wall-to-lumen ratio and decreased circumferential wall stress compared to WKY treatment groups.
Conclusions:
These data suggest that T and NE are involved in a complex interaction with both myogenic reactivity and structural alterations of resistance-sized blood vessels and that these factors likely contribute to the development and maintenance of hypertension.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Jonathan Toot</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Reho</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rolando Ramirez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jacqueline Novak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Ely</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2012, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-3-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-3-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/14">
        <title>Strategies and Methods to Study Sex Differences in Cardiovascular  Structure and Function: A Guide for Basic Scientists
</title>
        <description>Background:
Cardiovascular disease remains the primary cause of death worldwide.  In the United States, deaths due to cardiovascular disease for women exceed that of men.  While cultural and psychosocial factors such as education, economic status, marital status and access to health care contribute to sex differences in adverse outcomes, physiological and molecular bases of differences between women and men that contribute to development of cardiovascular disease and response to therapy remain underexplored.
Methods:
This article describes concepts, methods and procedures to assist in the design of animal and tissue/cell based studies of sex differences in cardiovascular structure, function and models of disease.
Results:
To address knowledge gaps, study designs must incorporate appropriate experimental material including species/strain characteristics, sex and hormonal status.  Determining whether a sex difference exists in a trait must take into account the reproductive status and history of the animal including those used for tissue (cell) harvest, such as the presence of gonadal steroids at the time of testing, during development or number of pregnancies.  When selecting the type of experimental animal, additional consideration should be given to diet requirements (soy or plant based influencing consumption of phytoestrogen), life-span, frequency of estrous cycle in females, and ability to investigate developmental or environmental components of disease modulation.  Stress imposed by disruption of sleep/wake cycles, patterns of social interaction (or degree of social isolation), or handling may influence adrenal hormones that interact with pathways activated by the sex-steroid hormones.  Care must be given to selection of hormonal treatment and route of administration.
Conclusion:
Accounting for sex in the design and interpretation of studies including pharmacological effects of drugs is essential to increase the foundation of basic knowledge upon which to build translational approaches to prevent, diagnose and treat cardiovascular diseases in humans.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Virginia Miller</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jay Kaplan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nicholas Schork</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pamela Ouyang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sarah Berga</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nanette Wenger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leslee Shaw</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>R Clinton Webb</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Monica Mallampalli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Meir Steiner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Doris Taylor</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>C Noel Bairey Merz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jane Reckelhoff</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2011, null:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-12-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-2-14</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-2-14-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/13">
        <title>Interference of kallikrein 1b26 (klk1b26) translation by microRNA specifically expressed in female mouse submandibular glands: an additional mechanism for sexual dimorphism of klk1b26 protein in the glands</title>
        <description>Background:
Mouse kallikrein 1b26 (klk1b26) protein is more abundant in male submandibular glands (SMGs) than in female ones. This sexual dimorphism has been thought to be due to increased mRNA synthesis stimulated by androgen. However, the klk1b26 protein level in female SMG is far less than that expected from the mRNA level, suggesting an additional mechanism for down-regulation of klk1b26 expression in female SMGs.
Methods:
We examined the effects of small non-coding RNAs in mouse SMGs on in vitro translation of klk1b26 using a reticulocyte lysate system and reverse transcription (RT)-PCR for klk1b26 mRNA. Statistical analyses were performed with a computer package (Microsoft Excel).
Results:
The microRNA (miRNA) preparation from female SMGs, but not male SMGs, interfered with the in vitro translation of the klk1b26 protein and inhibited the RT-PCR for klk1b26 mRNA with forward primers targeting its 5&apos;-terminal region (between the 15th and 40th nucleotide from the 5&apos;-terminal). The miRNA preparation from castrated mouse SMGs showed the inhibitory effect on the klk1b26 translation, but that from a 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone-treated female mouse SMGs did not. Synthetic miRNAs (miR-325 and miR-1497a), which have partial complementarity with klk1b26 mRNA at its 5&apos;-terminal region (15th to 40th nucleotide position from the 5&apos;-terminal), also interfered with the in vitro klk1b26 translation. When the female miRNA preparation was incubated with a 30-nucleotide-long single-strand oligoDNA (named [15th-44th]ssDNA, whose sequence corresponded to the 15th to 44th position from the 5&apos;-terminal of klk1b26 mRNA) prior to the addition into the in vitro translation system, the inhibitory effect of the miRNA preparation on klk1b26 translation disappeared, while [15th-44th]ssDNA itself had no effect on the translation. Preincubation of the miRNA preparation with another single-strand DNA ([169th-198th]ssDNA, whose sequence corresponded with 169th to 198th position of klk1b26 mRNA) did not show the inhibitory effect.
Conclusions:
The small non-coding RNA, most probably miRNA, specifically expressed in female mouse SMGs interfered with klk1b26 protein synthesis in the in vitro translation system. Therefore sexual dimorphism observed in klk1b26 expression in mouse SMGs is due at least in part to the female-specific small non-coding RNA in SMGs.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Kinji Kurihara</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nobuo Nakanishi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Akito Tomomura</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2011, null:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-11-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-2-13</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-2-13-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/12">
        <title>Women with knee osteoarthritis have more pain and poorer function than men, but similar physical activity prior to total knee replacement</title>
        <description>Background:
Osteoarthritis of the knee is a major clinical problem affecting a greater proportion of women than men. Women generally report higher pain intensity at rest and greater perceived functional deficits than men. Women also perform worse than men on function measures such as the 6-minute walk and timed up and go tests. Differences in pain sensitivity, pain during function, psychosocial variables, and physical activity levels are unclear. Further the ability of various biopsychosocial variables to explain physical activity, function and pain is unknown.
Methods:
This study examined differences in pain, pain sensitivity, function, psychosocial variables, and physical activity between women and men with knee osteoarthritis (N = 208) immediately prior to total knee arthroplasty. We assessed: (1) pain using self-report measures and a numerical rating scale at rest and during functional tasks, (2) pain sensitivity using quantitative sensory measures, (3) function with self-report measures and specific function tasks (timed walk, maximal active flexion and extension), (4) psychosocial measures (depression, anxiety, catastrophizing, and social support), and (5) physical activity using accelerometry. The ability of these mixed variables to explain physical activity, function and pain was assessed using regression analysis.
Results:
Our findings showed significant differences on pain intensity, pain sensitivity, and function tasks, but not on psychosocial measures or physical activity. Women had significantly worse pain and more impaired function than men. Their levels of depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, social support, and physical activity, however, did not differ significantly. Factors explaining differences in (1) pain during movement (during gait speed test) were pain at rest, knee extension, state anxiety, and pressure pain threshold; (2) function (gait speed test) were sex, age, knee extension, knee flexion opioid medications, pain duration, pain catastrophizing, body mass index (BMI), and heat pain threshold; and (3) physical activity (average metabolic equivalent tasks (METS)/day) were BMI, age, Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Function, Kellgren-Lawrence osteoarthritis grade, depression, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain subscale.
Conclusions:
Women continue to be as physically active as men prior to total knee replacement even though they have significantly more pain, greater pain sensitivity, poorer perceived function, and more impairment on specific functional tasks.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Shalome Tonelli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Barbara Rakel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nicholas Cooper</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Whitney Angstrom</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kathleen Sluka</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2011, null:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-11-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-2-12</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-2-12-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/11">
        <title>Reporting of sex as a variable in cardiovascular studies using cultured cells</title>
        <description>Background:
Chromosomal complement, including that provided by the sex chromosomes, influences expression of proteins and molecular signaling in every cell. However, less than 50% of the scientific studies published in 2009 using experimental animals reported sex as a biological variable. Because every cell has a sex, we conducted a literature review to determine the extent to which sex is reported as a variable in cardiovascular studies on cultured cells.
Methods:
Articles from 10 cardiovascular journals with high impact factors (Circulation, J Am Coll Cardiol, Eur Heart J, Circ Res, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, Cardiovasc Res, J Mol Cell Cardiol, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, J Heart Lung Transplant and J Cardiovasc Pharmacol) and published in 2010 were searched using terms &apos;cultured&apos; and &apos;cells&apos; in any order to determine if the sex of those cells was reported. Studies using established cell lines were excluded.
Results:
Using two separate search strategies, we found that only 25 of 90 articles (28%) and 20 of 101 articles (19.8%) reported the sex of cells. Of those reporting the sex of cells, most (68.9%; n = 31) used only male cells and none used exclusively female cells. In studies reporting the sex of cells of cardiovascular origin, 40% used vascular smooth-muscle cells, and 30% used stem/progenitor cells. In studies using cells of human origin, 35% did not report the sex of those cells. None of the studies using neonatal cardiac myocytes reported the sex of those cells.
Conclusions:
The complement of sex chromosomes in cells studied in culture has the potential to affect expression of proteins and &apos;mechanistic&apos; signaling pathways. Therefore, consistent with scientific excellence, editorial policies should require reporting sex of cells used in in vitro experiments.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>K. Efua Taylor</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Catalina Vallejo-Giraldo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Niccole Schaible</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rosita Zakeri</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Virginia Miller</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2011, null:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-11-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-2-11</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-2-11-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/10">
        <title>Cyclin D1 expression in colorectal cancer is a favourable prognostic factor in men but not women in a prospective, population-based cohort study</title>
        <description>Background:
Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is generally not considered to be a hormone-dependent malignancy, several sex-related differences in incidence, molecular characteristics and survival have been reported. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that increased exposure to female sex hormones is associated with a lower risk of CRC in women, and cyclin D1, an important downstream effector in estrogen-mediated signaling, is commonly activated in CRC. In this study, we analyzed the prognostic significance of cyclin D1 expression in CRC, with particular reference to sex-related differences, in tumors from a large, prospective, population-based cohort.
Methods:
Using tissue microarrays and immunohistochemistry, the fraction and intensity of cyclin D1 expression was evaluated in 527 incident CRC cases from the Malm&#246; Diet and Cancer Study. The &#967;2 and Spearman&apos;s rho (&#961;) tests were used for comparison of cyclin D1 expression and relevant clinicopathological characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to assess the effect of cyclin D1 expression on cancer-specific survival (CSS) in univariate and multivariate analysis, adjusted for established prognostic factors.
Results:
Cyclin D1 intensity was significantly lower in male compared with female CRC (P = 0.018). In the full cohort, cyclin D1 expression was associated with a significantly prolonged CSS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.69; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.96, P = 0.026) but subgroup analysis according to gender revealed a strongly accentuated prognostic effect of cyclin D1 in male CRC (HR = 0.48; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.74, P &lt; 0.001), which was in contrast to female CRC, where cyclin D1 was not prognostic (HR = 1.05; 95% CI 0.62 to 1.78, P = 0.864) (P
interaction = 0.024). The prognostic value of cyclin D1 was not retained in multivariate analysis, either in the full cohort or in male CRC.
Conclusions:
Cyclin D1 expression is strongly associated with prolonged survival in male CRC. These findings not only support an important role for cyclin D1 in colorectal carcinogenesis, but also add further weight to the accumulating evidence that CRC is indeed a hormone-dependent malignancy, for which prognostic and treatment-predictive molecular biomarkers should be evaluated differently in women and men.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Sakarias Wangefjord</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jonas Manjer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexander Gaber</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bjorn Nodin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jakob Eberhard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karin Jirstrom</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2011, null:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-09-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-2-10</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-2-10-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-09-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/9">
        <title>Sex differences in resting hemodynamics and arterial stiffness following 4 weeks of resistance versus aerobic exercise training in individuals with pre-hypertension to stage 1 hypertension
</title>
        <description>Background:
Hypertension (HTN) exhibits sexual dimorphism; the incidence for women surpasses men during the sixth decade of life, while the pharmacological treatments are less effective and produce more side-effects in women than in men. Aerobic exercise (AE) has been shown to prevent and treat HTN; however, resistance exercise (RE) is not recommended as a strategy to treat HTN. In this study, we investigated the potential sex differences of AE versus RE in a cohort of unmedicated patients with hypertension.
Methods:
In total, 40 moderately active, pre-hypertensive or stage 1 essential hypertensive male (M) and female (F) participants aged 40 to 60 years were randomly divided into four groups: M AE, M RE, F AE, and F. Each group exercised at moderate intensity, 3 days/week for 4 weeks. Hemodynamic, vascular and blood-flow data were collected before and after exercise training.
Results:
Men showed a significant increase in central pulse wave velocity following RE while females showed no significant changes (12 &#177; to 13.9 &#177; vs. 9.2 &#177; to 9.6 &#177; m/s, respectively). RE showed significantly greater increases in peak blood flow when compared to AE (F RE 15 &#177; to 20 &#177; vs. F AE 17.5 &#177; to19.5 &#177;, M RE 19 &#177; to 24 &#177; vs M AE 21 &#177; to 25 &#177; ml* 100 ml*min, respectively). In addition, systolic and diastolic BP decreased greater for women following RE when compared to AE whereas men showed comparable decreases in BP following either exercise mode.
Conclusion:
Moderate-intensity RE training may be a more favorable for women as a treatment option for hypertension because of greater decreases in diastolic BP and significant increases in flow-mediated dilation without concomitant increases in arterial stiffness, compared with their male counterparts.</description>
        <link>http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/2/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Scott Collier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vincent Frechette</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kathryn Sandberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patrick Schafer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hong Ji</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Harold Smulyan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bo Fernhall</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology of Sex Differences 2011, null:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-08-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2042-6410-2-9</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2042-6410-2-9-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Biology of Sex Differences</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2042-6410</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-08-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

